Low MOQ Twill Woven Iron On Patches
Embroidery Patch V.S. Woven Patch
A. From the appearance: Embroidery patch is vivid and solid than woven patch.
B. From the details: Woven patch has better performance in presenting the details than embroidery patch.
C. From the background fabrics: We can do embroidery on felt fabric, twill fabric, velvet fabric, leather fabric, etc.. While woven patch is more like a piece of integrated fabric itself and all woven patches have 100% coverage.
Specifications of the Iron On Patches
| Material | Chenille, Twill, Velvet, Felt, Reflective fabric or other special fabric, etc. |
|---|---|
| Logo Process | Embroidered, Woven, Printings, Chenille, PVC |
| Border | Merrowed, Hand Cut, Heat Cut, Laser Cut |
| Lead Time | 5-7 days for samples 7-15 days for mass production after artwork approval |
| Backing | Plain, Iron On, Sew on, Stick On, Hook & Loop, Wax Paper, Paper Coating Backing, Velcro |
| Packing | Poly bag, OPP bag |
| Application | Cloth patch, Cap patch, Shoulder patch, Garment Accessories… |
| Color Process | Hard Enamel / Imitation Hard Enamel / Soft Enamel / Printing / Blank |
Features And Advantages
Our success comes from our client’s support
We have grown from a mini factory to a large-scale enterprise who posses 40 embroidery machines, 6 out shape laser cut machines and around 200 workers. We are proud that our monthly capacity has been up to 8 million pieces now. What’s more, we’ve always remember care about the enterprise social responsibility and compliance with the government’s law and policy strictly so that passed the factory audit required by the U.S. Boy scout with zero defects.
Development of woven products
In order to meet client’s diversified needs, we are keeping on innovating on production skills and cover more kinds of products, like woven patches, woven label, woven keychain, woven charms etc.. We mostly welcome client give us more and more ideas about the products and hopefully we can help you create more and more creative products that can expand your market, thanks.
